[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161215171200.GY3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:12:00 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add printk maintainers
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:34:43PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> We have to find the right balance. For example, we do not show
> messages immediately in NMI context because there is a risk
> of a deadlock.
I find the occasional deadlock much preferable to guaranteed no output.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists