[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUKK8tAz2ZtCOB-FdhqbKeH9Qxh9vnuVshvQdqEsU-dDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:06:02 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@...il.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
xen-devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] CPUID-less CPU/sync_core fixes and improvements
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> *** PATCHES 1 and 2 MAY BE 4.9 MATERIAL ***
>
> Alan Cox pointed out that the 486 isn't the only supported CPU that
> doesn't have CPUID. Let's clean up the mess and make everything
> faster while we're at it.
>
Ping? Any chance of getting these in for 4.10?
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists