[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161215190902.tdle4uj27xkc3x4i@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 20:09:02 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: hpa@...or.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCHv1 15/28] x86: detect 5-level paging support
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 09:52:12AM -0800, hpa@...or.com wrote:
> This really is only worthwhile if it ends up producing better code,
> but I doubt it.
Nah, the most it does is drops those ifnc lines in there on newer gccs.
They will appear only on
gcc-4 and earlier and
if we're -fPIC and
if we're -m32 and
if we have enough register pressure to force gcc to use the PIC register
It was a good exercise for me to see in detail how would I go about
doing a gcc-specific workaround.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists