linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] blk-mq-sched: add framework for MQ capable IO schedulers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <82dd217d-2631-131a-a006-8b80908bf0ee@fb.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:44:17 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To:     Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
CC:     <axboe@...nel.dk>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        <osandov@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] blk-mq-sched: add framework for MQ capable IO
 schedulers

On 12/15/2016 12:29 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> Hey, Jens, a couple of minor nits below.
> 
> One bigger note: adding the blk_mq_sched_*() helpers and keeping the
> blk_mq_*() helpers that they replaced seems risky. For example,
> blk_mq_free_request() is superseded by blk_mq_sched_put_request(), but
> we kept blk_mq_free_request(). There are definitely some codepaths that
> are still using blk_mq_free_request() that are now wrong
> (__nvme_submit_user_cmd() is the most obvious one I saw).
> 
> Can we get rid of the old, non-sched functions? Or maybe even make old
> interface do the sched stuff instead of adding blk_mq_sched_*()?

I fixed this up. blk_mq_free_request() is now what we still use as an
exported interface, and that just calls blk_mq_sched_put_request().  The
old (__)blk_mq_free_request() are now (__)blk_mq_finish_request() and
internal only.

-- 
Jens Axboe