[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25bcced1-4903-2cf7-6a56-14c3ced5cd28@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:25:55 +0100
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>, paulus@...ba.org
Cc: michael@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
sjitindarsingh@...il.com, lvivier@...hat.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] powerpc/kvm: Reserve capabilities and ioctls for
HPT resizing
On 15.12.2016 06:53, David Gibson wrote:
> This adds a new powerpc-specific KVM_CAP_SPAPR_RESIZE_HPT capability to
> advertise whether KVM is capable of handling the PAPR extensions for
> resizing the hashed page table during guest runtime.
>
> At present, HPT resizing is possible with KVM PR without kernel
> modification, since the HPT is managed within qemu. It's not possible yet
> with KVM HV, because the HPT is managed by KVM. At present, qemu has to
> use other capabilities which (by accident) reveal whether PR or HV is in
> use to know if it can advertise HPT resizing capability to the guest.
>
> To avoid ambiguity with existing kernels, the encoding is a bit odd.
> 0 means "unknown" since that's what previous kernels will return
> 1 means "HPT resize possible if available if and only if the HPT is allocated in
> userspace, rather than in the kernel". Userspace can check
> KVM_CAP_PPC_ALLOC_HTAB to determine if that's the case. In practice
> this will give the same results as userspace's fallback check.
> 2 will mean "HPT resize available and implemented via ioctl()s
> KVM_PPC_RESIZE_HPT_PREPARE and KVM_PPC_RESIZE_HPT_COMMIT"
This encoding IMHO clearly needs some proper documentation in
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt ... and maybe also some dedicated
#defines in an uapi header file.
Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists