[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161216095624.GR3107@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:56:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: add new mmgrab() helper
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:21:59AM +0100, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> Apart from adding the helper function itself, the rest of the kernel is
> converted mechanically using:
>
> git grep -l 'atomic_inc.*mm_count' | xargs sed -i 's/atomic_inc(&\(.*\)->mm_count);/mmgrab\(\1\);/'
> git grep -l 'atomic_inc.*mm_count' | xargs sed -i 's/atomic_inc(&\(.*\)\.mm_count);/mmgrab\(\&\1\);/'
>
> This is needed for a later patch that hooks into the helper, but might be
> a worthwhile cleanup on its own.
Given the desire to replace all refcounting with a specific refcount
type, this seems to make sense.
FYI: http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2016/12/07/8
But I must say mmget() vs mmgrab() is a wee bit confusing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists