[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161216103615.GF13940@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:36:15 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: add new mmgrab() helper
On Fri 16-12-16 11:20:40, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On 12/16/2016 11:19 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:56:24AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > But I must say mmget() vs mmgrab() is a wee bit confusing.
> >
> > mm_count vs mm_users is not very clear too. :)
> >
>
> I was about to say, I'm not sure it's much better than mmput() vs
> mmdrop() or mm_users vs mm_count either, although the way I rationalised
> it was the 3 vs 4 letters:
>
> mmget() -- mmgrab()
> mmput() -- mmdrop()
> ^^^ 3 ^^^^ 4
get -> put
grab -> drop
makes sense to me... No idea about a much more clear name.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists