linux-kernel - RE: move hyperv CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD from crashed kernel to kdump kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM5PR03MB2490136C5A5B327E784411CCA09C0@DM5PR03MB2490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:51:51 +0000
From:   KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
CC:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
Subject: RE: move hyperv CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD from crashed kernel to kdump kernel



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@...hat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 6:32 AM
> To: Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
> Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org
> Subject: Re: move hyperv CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD from crashed kernel to
> kdump kernel
> 
> Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Dec 15, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >
> >> vmbus_wait_for_unload() may be receiving a message (not necessarily
> the
> >> CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE, we may see some other message)
> on the same
> >> CPU it runs and in this case wrmsrl() makes sense. In other cases it
> >> does nothing (neither good nor bad).
> >
> > If that other cpu has interrupts disabled it may not process a pending
> > msg (the response may be stuck in the host queue?), and the loop can not
> > kick the other cpus queue if a wrmsrl is just valid for the current cpu.
> > If thats true, the response will not arrive in the loop.
> >
> 
> In case interrupts get permanently disabled on the CPU which is supposed
> to receive the CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE message *and* there is
> some
> other message pedning in the slot for that CPU we'll hang. We may try to
> overcome this by sending NMIs but this is getting more and more
> complicated...
> 
> I'd like to see a simple fix from Hyper-V host team: always deliver
> CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE reply to the cpu which sent
> CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD
> request. This would allow us to remove all the craziness.

Agreed; I will give this feedback to the Hyper-V guys.

K. Y
> 
> --
>   Vitaly