[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161216144159.GE393@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:41:59 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/15] livepatch: temporary stubs for
klp_patch_pending() and klp_update_patch_state()
On Thu 2016-12-08 12:08:28, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Create temporary stubs for klp_patch_pending() and
> klp_update_patch_state() so we can add TIF_PATCH_PENDING to different
> architectures in separate patches without breaking build bisectability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/livepatch.h | 7 ++++++-
> kernel/livepatch/core.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/livepatch.h b/include/linux/livepatch.h
> index 9072f04..60558d8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/livepatch.h
> +++ b/include/linux/livepatch.h
> @@ -123,10 +123,15 @@ void arch_klp_init_object_loaded(struct klp_patch *patch,
> int klp_module_coming(struct module *mod);
> void klp_module_going(struct module *mod);
>
> +static inline bool klp_patch_pending(struct task_struct *task) { return false; }
I was curious about this. It is implemented correctly in the 13th
patch and it is never used until 13th patch.
> +void klp_update_patch_state(struct task_struct *task);
It seems that the stub for this function is enough.
Well, the extra function is just a cosmetic problem. If it could be
fixed, it would be great. But the patch makes sense:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists