linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add clk-480m for ehci and ohci of rk3399

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W1BW6FSZ6MSxR6RhvtZyGsdQbz9vU_QshaQ5A65ENMCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:28:21 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>
To:     Xing Zheng <zhengxing@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Frank Wang <frank.wang@...k-chips.com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        William wu <wulf@...k-chips.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
        Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
        Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "daniel.meng" <daniel.meng@...k-chips.com>,
        Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
        郑兴 <xing.zheng@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add clk-480m for ehci and ohci
 of rk3399

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Xing Zheng <zhengxing@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> Hi Heiko, Doug,
>
> On 2016年12月16日 02:18, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2016, 08:34:09 CET schrieb Doug Anderson:
>
>
> I still need to digest all of the things that were added to this
> thread overnight, but nothing I've seen so far indicates that you need
> the post-gated clock.  AKA I still think you need to redo your patch
> to replace:
>
>               clocks = <&cru HCLK_HOST0>, <&cru HCLK_HOST0_ARB>,
>                        <&cru SCLK_USBPHY0_480M_SRC>;
>
> with:
>
>               clocks = <&cru HCLK_HOST0>, <&cru HCLK_HOST0_ARB>,
>                         <&u2phy0>;
>
> Can you please comment on that?
>
> Also, with the change, the ehci will keep the clock (and thus the phy)
> always
> on. Does the phy-autosuspend even save anything now?
>
> In any case, could we make the clock-names entry sound nicer than
> usbphy0_480m
> please? bindings/usb/atmel-usb.txt calls its UTMI clock simply "usb_clk",
> but
> something like "utmi" should also work.
> While at it you could also fix up the other clock names to something like
> "host" and "arbiter" or so?.
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
> The usbphy related clock tress like this:
>
>
> Actually, at drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c, we can only
> enable/disable the master gate via GRF is PHY_PLL, not UTMI_CLK.
>
> And the naming style of the "hclk_host0" keep the name "hclk_host0" on the
> clcok tree diagram:
>
>
> Therefore, could we rename the clock name like this:
> ----
> for usb_host0_ehci and usb_host0_ohci:
>         clocks = <&cru HCLK_HOST0>, <&cru HCLK_HOST0_ARB>,
>              <&cru SCLK_U2PHY0>;
>         clock-names = "hclk_host0", "hclk_host0_arb",
>                   "sclk_u2phy0";
>
> for usb_host1_ehci and usb_host1_ohci:
>         clocks = <&cru HCLK_HOST1>, <&cru HCLK_HOST1_ARB>,
>              <&cru SCLK_U2PHY1>;
>         clock-names = "hclk_host1", "hclk_host1_arb",
>                   "sclk_u2phy1";
> ----
>
> BTW, the "arb" is an abbreviation for arbiter.

You don't specify what this new "SCLK_U2PHY0" ID is, so it's a little
hard for me to know what you're intending.

...however, I still don't see any reason why you can't just use the
solution I proposed.  Specifying the clock as "<&u2phy0>" is the
correct thing to do.  The input clock to the EHCI driver is exactly
the clock provided by the USB PHY with no gate in between (just as I
said).  There is no reason to somehow buffer it by the cru.  The cru
doesn't see this clock and has no reason to be involved.


> Thanks.

Note that there were many other comments on this thread besides mine.
Are you planning to address any of them?

-Doug