linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] nvme: Improvements in sysfs entry for NVMe CMBs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b2755703b7823eb26f282218ef29362b.squirrel@webmail.raithlin.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:37:46 -0600
From:   "Stephen Bates" <sbates@...thlin.com>
To:     "Jens Axboe" <axboe@...com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com,
        sagi@...mberg.me, jonathan.derrick@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] nvme: Improvements in sysfs entry for NVMe CMBs

>> Jens I based this off v4.9 because for some reason your for-4.10/block
>> is missing my original CMB commit (202021c1a63c6)?
>
> for-4.10/block was forked off v4.9-rc1, and that patch didn't make it in
> until v4.9-rc2. Since for-4.10/block has been merged, any patches for this
> series or next should be based on my for-linus, or just master.
>
> Assuming these two apply directly to master as well?
>
>

Ah thanks for clearing up my confusion ;-). Yes, this series applies
cleanly to both your master and for-linus branches.


Stephen