linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] perf tool: add PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES to include namespaces related info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161217174016.GA722@krava>
Date:   Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:40:16 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     ast@...com, peterz@...radead.org,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, acme@...nel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        ebiederm@...ssion.com, sargun@...gun.me,
        Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        brendan.d.gregg@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] perf tool: add PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES to include
 namespaces related info

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:07:20AM +0530, Hari Bathini wrote:

SNIP

> +
> +int thread__set_namespaces(struct thread *thread, u64 timestamp,
> +			   struct namespaces_event *event)
> +{
> +	struct namespaces *new, *curr = thread__namespaces(thread);
> +
> +	new = namespaces__new(event);
> +	if (!new)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	list_add(&new->list, &thread->namespaces_list);
> +
> +	if (timestamp && curr) {
> +		/*
> +		 * setns syscall must have changed few or all the namespaces
> +		 * of this thread. Update end time for the namespaces
> +		 * previously used.
> +		 */
> +		curr = list_next_entry(new, list);
> +		curr->end_time = timestamp;

hi,
couldn't you use just the curr you got from thread__namespaces?
why to retrieve it again via 'new' pointer?

thanks,
jirka