lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161217073813.GB23567@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Sat, 17 Dec 2016 08:38:13 +0100
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc:     sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Bob Picco <bob.picco@...cle.com>,
        Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@...cle.com>,
        Vijay Kumar <vijay.ac.kumar@...cle.com>,
        Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
        Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] sparc64: add new fields to mmu context for
 shared context support

Hi Mike

> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h
> index b84be67..d031799 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/mmu_context_64.h
> @@ -35,15 +35,15 @@ void __tsb_context_switch(unsigned long pgd_pa,
>  static inline void tsb_context_switch(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	__tsb_context_switch(__pa(mm->pgd),
> -			     &mm->context.tsb_block[0],
> +			     &mm->context.tsb_block[MM_TSB_BASE],
>  #if defined(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) || defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)
> -			     (mm->context.tsb_block[1].tsb ?
> -			      &mm->context.tsb_block[1] :
> +			     (mm->context.tsb_block[MM_TSB_HUGE].tsb ?
> +			      &mm->context.tsb_block[MM_TSB_HUGE] :
>  			      NULL)
>  #else
>  			     NULL
>  #endif
> -			     , __pa(&mm->context.tsb_descr[0]));
> +			     , __pa(&mm->context.tsb_descr[MM_TSB_BASE]));
>  }
>  
This is a nice cleanup that has nothing to do with your series.
Could you submit this as a separate patch so we can get it applied.

This is the only place left where the array index for tsb_block
and tsb_descr uses hardcoded values. And it would be good to get
rid of these.

	Sam

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ