[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpeguwvwy78-ahrswi5_RRENUzuSbqF2PR2x+nKxX1WC6h9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:06:36 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the overlayfs tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the overlayfs tree got conflicts in:
>
> fs/overlayfs/dir.c
> fs/overlayfs/inode.c
>
> I am pretty sure thses conflicts only exist because the overlayfs tree
> was rebased before being merged by Linus. I am dropping the oevrlay fs
> tree for today. Please clean it up.
Hi Stephen,
Sorry, fixed now.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists