linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify node/zone name printing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:05:49 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify node/zone name printing

On Mon 2016-12-19 08:00:47, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 12/16/2016 01:32 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> > 
> > show_node currently only prints Node id while it is always followed by
> > printing zone->name. As the node information is conditional to
> > CONFIG_NUMA we have to be careful to always terminate the previous
> > continuation line before printing the zone name. This is quite ugly
> > and easy to mess up. Let's rename show_node to show_zone_node and
> > make sure that it will always start at a new line. We can drop the ugly
> > printk(KERN_CONT "\n") from show_free_areas.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> 
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 3f2c9e535f7f..5324efa8b9d0 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -4120,10 +4120,12 @@ unsigned long nr_free_pagecache_pages(void)
> >  	return nr_free_zone_pages(gfp_zone(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE));
> >  }
> >  
> > -static inline void show_node(struct zone *zone)
> > +static inline void show_zone_node(struct zone *zone)
> >  {
> >  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA))
> > -		printk("Node %d ", zone_to_nid(zone));
> > +		printk("Node %d %s", zone_to_nid(zone), zone->name);
> > +	else
> > +		printk("%s: ", zone->name);
> >  }
> >  
> >  long si_mem_available(void)
> > @@ -4371,9 +4373,8 @@ void show_free_areas(unsigned int filter)
> >  		for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> >  			free_pcp += per_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset, cpu)->pcp.count;
> >  
> > -		show_node(zone);
> > +		show_zone_node(zone);
> >  		printk(KERN_CONT
> > -			"%s"

The new code will printk "%s: " when called with disabled CONFIG_NUMA.
Is the added ": " OK?

Best Regards,
Petr