linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] dmaengine: Add support for custom data mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Dec 2016 21:19:23 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Cc:     Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org, mcgrof@...e.com,
        okaya@...eaurora.org, pramod.gurav@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dmaengine: Add support for custom data mapping

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:06:42PM -0600, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 09:56:02PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:25:52PM +0530, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
> > > The current DMA APIs only support SGL or data in generic format.
> > > The QCA BAM DMA engine data cannot be mapped with already
> > > available APIs due to following reasons.
> > > 
> > > 1. The QCA BAM DMA engine uses custom flags which cannot be
> > >    mapped with generic DMA engine flags.
> > > 2. Some peripheral driver like QCA QPIC NAND/LCD requires to
> > >    set specific flags (Like NWD, EOT) for some of the descriptors
> > >    in scatter gather list. The already available mapping APIs take
> > >    flags parameter in API itself and there is no support for
> > >    passing DMA specific flags for each SGL entry.
> > > 
> > > Now this patch adds the support for making the DMA descriptor from
> > > custom data with new DMA mapping function prep_dma_custom_mapping.
> > > The peripheral driver will pass the custom data in this function and
> > > DMA engine driver will form the descriptor according to its own
> > > logic. In future, this API can be used by any other DMA engine
> > > drivers also which are unable to do DMA mapping with already
> > > available API’s.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/dmaengine.h | 5 +++++
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > > index cc535a4..6324c1f 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > > @@ -692,6 +692,8 @@ struct dma_filter {
> > >   *	be called after period_len bytes have been transferred.
> > >   * @device_prep_interleaved_dma: Transfer expression in a generic way.
> > >   * @device_prep_dma_imm_data: DMA's 8 byte immediate data to the dst address
> > > + * @device_prep_dma_custom_mapping: prepares a dma operation from dma driver
> > > + *	specific custom data
> > >   * @device_config: Pushes a new configuration to a channel, return 0 or an error
> > >   *	code
> > >   * @device_pause: Pauses any transfer happening on a channel. Returns
> > > @@ -783,6 +785,9 @@ struct dma_device {
> > >  	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *(*device_prep_dma_imm_data)(
> > >  		struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dst, u64 data,
> > >  		unsigned long flags);
> > > +	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *(*device_prep_dma_custom_mapping)(
> > > +		struct dma_chan *chan, void *data,
> > > +		unsigned long flags);
> > 
> > This needs a discussion. Why do you need to add a new API for framework.
> > 
> > What are NWD and EOT flags, cna you details out the flags?
> 
> These are the notify when done and end of transaction flags.  I believe the last
> time we talked about this, we (Vinod and I)  agreed to just expose a QCOM only interface to set
> the special transaction flags.  You'd then have to have some other API to fixup
> the descriptor with the right qcom flags.

Okay, do you have pointer on that one, will avoid asking the same questions
again.

> Ahbishek, correct me where i am wrong on the following:
> So two main differences between a normal descriptor and a command descriptor:
> 1) size of the descriptor
> 2) the flag setting
> 3) data sent in is a modified scatter gather that includes flags , vs a normal
> scatter gather
> 
> So the CMD descriptors in a given sgl can all have varying flags set? I'd assume
> they all have CMD flag set.  Do the current users of the command descriptors
> coalesce all of their requests into a big list?
> 
> So a couple of thoughts on how to deal with this:
> 
> 1) Define a virtual channel for the command descriptors vs a normal DMA
> transaction.  This lets you use the same hardware channel, but lets you discern
> which descriptor format you need to use.  The only issue I see with this is the
> required change in device tree binding to target the right type of channel (cmd
> vs normal).

Or mark the descriptor is cmd and write accordingly...

> 
> 2) Provide an API to set flags for the descriptor on a whole descriptor basis.
> 
> 3) If you have a set of transactions described by an sgl that has disparate use
> of flags, you split the list and use a separate transaction.  In other words, we
> need to enforce that the flag set API will be applied to all descriptors
> described by an sgl.  This means that the whole transaction may be comprised of
> multiple async TX descriptors.

-- 
~Vinod