lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iF6BmieCDUvxhJ+-s0RNfKfzi1yi8YHnNB1jUEUNFGO4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:57:58 +0530
From:   Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
To:     Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
Cc:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] phy: rockchip-typec: fix non static symbol warnings

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
>
> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
>
> drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.c:295:16: warning:
>  symbol 'usb3_pll_cfg' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.c:312:16: warning:
>  symbol 'dp_pll_cfg' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> index 7cfb0f8..555604c 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.c
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ struct phy_reg {
>         u32 addr;
>  };
>
> -struct phy_reg usb3_pll_cfg[] = {
> +static struct phy_reg usb3_pll_cfg[] = {

const as well ?

>         { 0xf0,         CMN_PLL0_VCOCAL_INIT },
>         { 0x18,         CMN_PLL0_VCOCAL_ITER },
>         { 0xd0,         CMN_PLL0_INTDIV },
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ struct phy_reg usb3_pll_cfg[] = {
>         { 0x8,          CMN_DIAG_PLL0_LF_PROG },
>  };
>
> -struct phy_reg dp_pll_cfg[] = {
> +static struct phy_reg dp_pll_cfg[] = {

const ?
[..]


Thanks
Vivek

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ