[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2535801482226783@web18g.yandex.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:39:43 +0200
From: Ozgur Karatas <okaratas@...ber.fsf.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "dave@...olabs.net" <dave@...olabs.net>,
"dvhart@...ux.intel.com" <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
"bigeasy@...utronix.de" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel: futex: fixed to else and initcall
20.12.2016, 11:21, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Ozgur Karatas wrote:
>
>> else doesn't need to be used, if should be enclosed in parentheses.
>
> Really?
>
>
> So you change the code from
>
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
> else
> err = 0;
>
> to
>
> if (err < 0) {
> return err;
> err = 0;
> }
>
> How on earth is that equivivalent and how would that 'err = 0;' statement
> be ever executed?
Oh my god, I missed this point, sorry!
Thank you so much for correct me.
This "return err;" will give to "err" and err defined to err = "0".
Then removed to "else" and return = err; and should it be like this?
#define err = 0;
if (err < 0) {
return err;
}
Regards,
Ozgur
> You clearly ran checkpatch.pl on this file and the output for this
> construct is:
>
> WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
> #550: FILE: kernel/futex.c:550:
> + return err;
> + else
>
> So the proper change would have been:
>
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
>
> err = 0;
>
> and not the trainwreck you created.
>
> checkpatch.pl does not substitute basic knowlegde of C.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists