[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161220154639.GA16393@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:46:39 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Scott Bauer <scott.bauer@...el.com>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, Rafael.Antognolli@...el.com,
axboe@...com, jonathan.derrick@...el.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sagi@...mberg.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] nvme: Implement resume_from_suspend and SED
Allocation code.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:49:16AM -0500, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:17:44PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > As far as I can tell Security Send / Receive has always been intended to
> > apply to the whole controller, even if that's something I would not
> > personally think is a good idea.
>
> NVMe security commands required the namespace ID since the very
> beginning. It's currently documented in figure 42 of section 5,
> "Namespace Identifier Used" column.
Oh, for some reason I read a no there when looking it up.
Good to know, although TCG spec still seem to ignore it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists