lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1482254995.1984.20.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:29:55 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Cc:     Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@...el.com>,
        Emoly Liu <emoly.liu@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Fertman <vitaly_fertman@...atex.com>,
        Bruno Faccini <bruno.faccini@...el.com>,
        Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@...il.com>,
        lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing?

On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 17:00 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare to mark sensitive kernel structures for randomization by making
sure they're using designated initializers.

About the designated initializer patches,
which by themselves are fine of course,
and the fundamental randomization plugin,
c guarantees that struct member ordering
is as specified.

how is the code to be verified so that
any use of things like offsetof and any
address/indexing is not impacted?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ