[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <58593997020000F9001B859F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:00:55 -0700
From: "Gang He" <ghe@...e.com>
To: <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: <kbuild-all@...org>, <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
<mfasheh@...sity.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: Re: [kbuild-all] 答复: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ocfs2: add kobject for online file check
Hi Fengguang and all,
I will reconstruct my patch set, to make sure each patch can follow this rule.
Thanks
Gang
>>> Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com> 2016-12-20 上午 9:47 >>>
Hi Gang,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 06:43:48PM -0700, Gang He wrote:
>Hello Kbuild,
>Could you build my whole patch set (2 patch)? I think that the code is OK.
We test your whole patch as well as first-N patches, and noticed that
the first-1 patch breaks bisectibility:
>Note: the linux-review/Gang-He/ocfs2-add-kobject-for-online-file-check/20161219-181858 HEAD 6ef9256cd25ef72a5e69490cc3dacde95b8e2ac4 builds fine.
> It only hurts bisectibility.
Thanks,
Fengguang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists