[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161220.133334.158286071772728328.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:33:34 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mike.kravetz@...cle.com
Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bob.picco@...cle.com,
nitin.m.gupta@...cle.com, vijay.ac.kumar@...cle.com,
julian.calaby@...il.com, adam.buchbinder@...il.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...e.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/14] sparc64: load shared id into context
register 1
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 16:06:01 -0800
> Ok, let me try to find a way to eliminate these loads unless the application
> is using shared context.
>
> Part of the issue is a 'backwards compatibility' feature of the processor
> which loads/overwrites register 1 every time register 0 is loaded. Somewhere
> in the evolution of the processor, a feature was added so that register 0
> could be loaded without overwriting register 1. That could be used to
> eliminate the extra load in some/many cases. But, that would likely lead
> to more runtime kernel patching based on processor level. And, I don't
> really want to add more of that if possible. Or, perhaps we only enable
> the shared context ID feature on processors which have the ability to work
> around the backwards compatibility feature.
Until the first process uses shared mappings, you should not touch the
context 1 register in any way for any reason at all.
And even once a process _does_ use shared mappings, you only need to
access the context 1 register in 2 cases:
1) TLB processing for the processes using shared mappings.
2) Context switch MMU state handling, where either the previous or
next process is using shared mappings.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists