linux-kernel - Re: [mm PATCH 0/3] Page fragment updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:22:34 -0800
From:   Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [mm PATCH 0/3] Page fragment updates

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 09:01:12 -0800 Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Alexander Duyck
>> <alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
>> > This patch series takes care of a few cleanups for the page fragments API.
>> >
>> > ...
>>
>> It's been about a week since I submitted this series.  Just wanted to
>> check in and see if anyone had any feedback or if this is good to be
>> accepted for 4.10-rc1 with the rest of the set?
>
> Looks good to me.  I have it all queued for post-4.9 processing.

So I guess there is a small bug in the first patch in that I was
comparing a pointer to to 0 instead of NULL.  Just wondering if I
should resubmit the first patch, the whole series, or if I need to
just submit an incremental patch.

Thanks.

- Alex