[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <585A3616.4050009@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:58:14 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc: myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Kishon <kishon@...com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] extcon: Add documentation for EXTCON_CHG_USB_* and
EXTCON_USB_*
Hi,
On 2016년 12월 21일 16:53, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 21 December 2016 at 15:20, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2016년 12월 21일 15:10, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>> Current there is both "EXTCON_USB" and "EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP" which
>>> both seem to suggest a standard downstream port. But there is no
>>> documentation describing how these relate.
>>>
>>> Thus add documentation to describe EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP should always
>>> appear together with EXTCON_USB, and EXTCON_CHG_USB_ACA would normally
>>> appear with EXTCON_USB_HOST.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/extcon.h | 9 ++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/extcon.h b/include/linux/extcon.h
>>> index b871c0c..6498b05 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/extcon.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/extcon.h
>>> @@ -46,7 +46,14 @@
>>> #define EXTCON_USB 1
>>> #define EXTCON_USB_HOST 2
>>>
>>> -/* Charging external connector */
>>> +/*
>>> + * Charging external connector
>>> + *
>>> + * When one SDP charger connector was reported, we should also report
>>> + * the USB connector, which means EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP should always
>>> + * appear together with EXTCON_USB. The same as ACA charger connector,
>>> + * EXTCON_CHG_USB_ACA should always appear with EXTCON_USB_HOST.
>>> + */
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>> But, you use the different word for ACA as following:
>> I think that 'would normally' is proper in descritpion.
>
> Okay, I will change to 'would normally' in next version patch. Thanks.
Don't need to send next patch. I modify it and apply it. Thanks.
--
Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists