lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:54:27 +0100 From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> Cc: myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Unregistering extcon providers while they are in use leads to kernel crashes Hi, With the recent extcon work I've been doing I noticed that if I want to rmmod and then insmod say extcon_axp288 I can do so without problems even if axp288_charger is holding a reference to the extcon device returned by extcon_get_extcon_dev. The problem is that extcon_get_extcon_dev simply looks up the extcon-device in the list of current registered extcon-s and then returns a pointer to it, without any reference counting. The rmmod scenario can be fixed by doing a module_get from extcon_get_extcon_dev, but that still leaves the same problem when root manually unbinds the driver through sysfs. A possible way fix this would be: 1) Make all extcon providers use devm_extcon_dev_allocate and document using this to allocate an extcon_dev mandatory 2) Add a refcount to struct extcon_dev and introduce extcon_dev_get and extcon_dev_put helpers which modify the refcount and only free the memory on the final put (and make the evm_extcon_dev_allocate cleanup function call extcon_dev_put) 3) On extcon_dev_unregister set a flag in the extcon_dev that it has been free-ed, make all extcon consumer functions which take an extcon_dev (extcon_get_state, extcon_register_notifier, etc.) check this flag and return -ENODEV when the extcon has been unregistered 4) Make extcon_get_extcon_dev call extcon_dev_get on the returned edev before returning it From here on we've fixed the crash, but we now leak the extcon_dev when the consumer gets unbound. 5) Add a devm_extcon_get_extcon_dev which calls extcon_dev_put as the devm cleanup function 6) Convert all extcon consumers to use devm_extcon_get_extcon_dev Regards, Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists