linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v1 24/30] IMA: switch IMA over to new i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1482339827-7882-25-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:03:41 -0500
From:   Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 24/30] IMA: switch IMA over to new i_version API

This change is straightforward, but I have some serious doubts about
this code.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c  | 2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
index 9df26a2b75ba..1f676313c30b 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
 	} hash;
 
 	if (!(iint->flags & IMA_COLLECTED)) {
-		u64 i_version = file_inode(file)->i_version;
+		u64 i_version = inode_get_iversion(file_inode(file));
 
 		if (file->f_flags & O_DIRECT) {
 			audit_cause = "failed(directio)";
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index 423d111b3b94..8d95cf42d20c 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static void ima_check_last_writer(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
 
 	inode_lock(inode);
 	if (atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) == 1) {
-		if ((iint->version != inode->i_version) ||
+		if (inode_cmp_iversion(inode, iint->version) ||
 		    (iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE)) {
 			iint->flags &= ~(IMA_DONE_MASK | IMA_NEW_FILE);
 			iint->measured_pcrs = 0;
-- 
2.7.4