[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161221175320.GB4716@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:53:20 -0700
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax: kill uml support
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 05:37:40PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> The lack of common transparent-huge-page helpers for UML is becoming
> increasingly painful for fs/dax.c now that it is growing more pmd
> functionality. Add UML to the list of unsupported architectures, and
> clean up no-longer-necessary ifdef as a result.
>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Sure, this is fine, assuming UML was the only problem architecture. I've
pushed this code to my kernel.org tree and should hopefully hear back from
0day shortly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists