linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dax: kill uml support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:45:50 -0800
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax: kill uml support

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 05:37:40PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> The lack of common transparent-huge-page helpers for UML is becoming
>> increasingly painful for fs/dax.c now that it is growing more pmd
>> functionality. Add UML to the list of unsupported architectures, and
>> clean up no-longer-necessary ifdef as a result.
>>
>> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>
> Sure, this is fine, assuming UML was the only problem architecture.  I've
> pushed this code to my kernel.org tree and should hopefully hear back from
> 0day shortly.

I got a success notification from 0day before I sent the patch.