linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in pci_mcfg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1482397663-98715-1-git-send-email-wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:07:43 +0800
From:   Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
        Jayachandran C <jchandra@...adcom.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        jorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC:     <liudongdong3@...wei.com>, <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>,
        <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in pci_mcfg_lookup

Multiple PCIe host bridges may exists in one PCIe segment. So bus range for each
host bridge should be in the coverage of bus range of related PCIe segment.

This patch will support this kind of scenario:

MCFG:
	bus range: 0x00~0xff.
	segment: 0.
DSDT:
	host bridge 1:
		bus range: 0x00~0x1f.
		segment: 0.
	host bridge 2:
		bus range: 0x20~0x4f.
		segment: 0.

Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
index b5b376e..46a3e32 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
@@ -40,11 +40,10 @@ phys_addr_t pci_mcfg_lookup(u16 seg, struct resource *bus_res)
 	struct mcfg_entry *e;
 
 	/*
-	 * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than
-	 * specified by caller.
+	 * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range.
 	 */
 	list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) {
-		if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start &&
+		if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start &&
 		    e->bus_end >= bus_res->end)
 			return e->addr;
 	}
-- 
1.9.1