[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161222093828.GF6048@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:38:28 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, logfs@...fs.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9 v2] scope GFP_NOFS api
Are there any objections to the approach and can we have this merged to
the mm tree?
Dave has expressed the patch2 should be dropped for now. I will do that
in a next submission but I do not want to resubmit until there is a
consensus on this.
What do other than xfs/ext4 developers think about this API. Can we find
a way to use it?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists