linux-kernel - [PATCH 25/66] hwmon: (lm92) use permission-specific DEVICE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1482408335-3435-26-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:04:54 +0100
From:   Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 25/66] hwmon: (lm92) use permission-specific DEVICE_ATTR variants

Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO etc. for read only attributes etc.  This simplifies the
source code, improves readbility, and reduces the chance of
inconsistencies.

The semantic patch for the RO case, in the case where the show function
already has the expected name, is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@ro@
declarer name DEVICE_ATTR;
identifier x,x_show;
@@

DEVICE_ATTR(x, \(0444\|S_IRUGO\), x_show, NULL);

@script:ocaml@
x << ro.x;
x_show << ro.x_show;
@@

if not (x^"_show" = x_show) then Coccilib.include_match false

@@
declarer name DEVICE_ATTR_RO;
identifier ro.x,ro.x_show;
@@

- DEVICE_ATTR(x, \(0444\|S_IRUGO\), x_show, NULL);
+ DEVICE_ATTR_RO(x);
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>

---
 drivers/hwmon/lm92.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm92.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm92.c
index cfaf70b..2a91974 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm92.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm92.c
@@ -181,8 +181,8 @@ static ssize_t show_temp_hyst(struct device *dev,
 		       - TEMP_FROM_REG(data->temp[t_hyst]));
 }
 
-static ssize_t show_temp_min_hyst(struct device *dev,
-				  struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+static ssize_t temp1_min_hyst_show(struct device *dev,
+				   struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
 	struct lm92_data *data = lm92_update_device(dev);
 	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", TEMP_FROM_REG(data->temp[t_min])
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static ssize_t set_temp_hyst(struct device *dev,
 	return count;
 }
 
-static ssize_t show_alarms(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
+static ssize_t alarms_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 			   char *buf)
 {
 	struct lm92_data *data = lm92_update_device(dev);
@@ -235,11 +235,11 @@ static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_crit_hyst, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, show_temp_hyst,
 			  set_temp_hyst, t_crit);
 static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_min, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, show_temp, set_temp,
 			  t_min);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_min_hyst, S_IRUGO, show_temp_min_hyst, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(temp1_min_hyst);
 static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_max, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, show_temp, set_temp,
 			  t_max);
 static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_max_hyst, S_IRUGO, show_temp_hyst, NULL, t_max);
-static DEVICE_ATTR(alarms, S_IRUGO, show_alarms, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(alarms);
 static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_crit_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 2);
 static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_min_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 0);
 static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_max_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 1);