[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <585B17E3.5040809@digikod.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 01:01:39 +0100
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] security: Add a new hook: inode_touch_atime
On 22/12/2016 00:33, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 12/21/2016 3:15 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> Add a new LSM hook named inode_touch_atime which is needed to deny
>> indirect update of extended file attributes (i.e. access time) which are
>> not catched by the inode_setattr hook. By creating a new hook instead of
>> calling inode_setattr, we avoid to simulate a useless struct iattr.
>>
>> This hook allows to create read-only environments as with read-only
>> mount points. It can also take care of anonymous inodes.
>
> What security module would use this?
SELinux should be interested. This is useful to create sandboxes so
other LSM may be interested too
I'm working on a new LSM and I would like this kind of hook to create a
real read-only environment.
Regards,
Mickaël
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists