[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1482425838.2682.9.camel@sandisk.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:57:36 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
To: "osandov@...ndov.com" <osandov@...ndov.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"osandov@...com" <osandov@...com>, "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"paolo.valente@...aro.org" <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v4] blk-mq-scheduling framework
On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 08:52 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> This approach occurred to us, but we couldn't figure out a way to make
> blk_mq_tag_to_rq() work with it. From skimming over the patches, I
> didn't see a solution to that problem.
Hello Omar,
Can you clarify your comment? Since my patches initialize both tags->rqs[]
and sched_tags->rqs[] the function blk_mq_tag_to_rq() should still work.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists