[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74e1e76d-40f6-db8e-74ac-90b0474d4e11@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:00:50 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Weilong Chen <chenweilong@...wei.com>
CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ixgbevf: fix 'Etherleak' in ixgbevf
On 2016/12/21 10:20, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> I find it curious that only the last 4 bytes have data in them. I'm
> wondering if the NIC/driver in the Windows/Nessus system is
> interpreting the 4 byte CRC on the end of the frame as padding instead
> of stripping it.
>
> Is there any chance you could capture the entire frame instead of just
> the padding? Maybe you could run something like wireshark without
> enabling promiscuous mode on the VF and capture the frames it is
> trying to send and receive. What I want to verify is what the actual
> amount of padding is that is needed to get to 60 bytes and where the
> CRC should start.
>
> - Alex
Here is the verbose output, is this useful?
Or we will try according to your advice, thanks,
D:\Program Files\Tenable\Nessus>nasl.exe -aX -t 192.169.0.151 etherleak.nasl
--------------------------
---[ ICMP ]---
0x00: 45 00 00 1D 20 81 00 00 40 01 D7 F3 C0 A9 00 97 E... ...@.......
0x10: C0 A9 00 82 00 00 87 FD 00 01 00 01 78 00 00 00 ............x...
0x20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 98 E4 75 DF ............u.
--------------------------
---[ ICMP ]---
0x00: 45 00 00 1D 20 85 00 00 40 01 D7 EF C0 A9 00 97 E... ...@.......
0x10: C0 A9 00 82 00 00 87 FD 00 01 00 01 78 00 00 00 ............x...
0x20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FB DA F8 13 ..............
---[ ether1 ]---
0x00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 98 E4 75 ...............u
0x10: DF .
---[ ether2 ]---
0x00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FB DA F8 ................
0x10: 13 .
Padding observed in one frame :
0x00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 98 E4 75 ...............u
0x10: DF .
Padding observed in another frame :
0x00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FB DA F8 ................
0x10: 13
Powered by blists - more mailing lists