[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <585D7BA9.50509@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 20:31:53 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: john.r.fastabend@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/9] virtio-net: remove the warning before XDP linearizing
Hi Jason,
On 12/23/2016 03:37 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> Since we use EWMA to estimate the size of rx buffer. When rx buffer
> size is underestimated, it's usual to have a packet with more than one
> buffers. Consider this is not a bug, remove the warning and correct
> the comment before XDP linearizing.
>
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 08327e0..1067253 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -552,14 +552,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
> struct page *xdp_page;
> u32 act;
>
> - /* No known backend devices should send packets with
> - * more than a single buffer when XDP conditions are
> - * met. However it is not strictly illegal so the case
> - * is handled as an exception and a warning is thrown.
> - */
> + /* This happens when rx buffer size is underestimated */
> if (unlikely(num_buf > 1)) {
> - bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_buffer();
Could you also remove the bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_buffer(), which got added
just for this?
Thanks.
> /* linearize data for XDP */
> xdp_page = xdp_linearize_page(rq, num_buf,
> page, offset, &len);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists