linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxXTfdX86f_Dp_96iccDgpzQLg2mCqZ9yCoi8LyjF=sgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:45:16 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] watchdog - v4.10 merge window

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> FWIW:

Hey, I can generate those myself.

But when they aren't generated by the person who sends the pull
request, they are worthless.

The whole point is that I need to get it with the pull request, so
that I can see that what I get is what the requester really meant for
me to get, and that (hopefully) the person who made the request looked
it over and there's nothing surprising to that person either.

                  Linus