lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0697753c-ea66-805d-a366-7de708efc066@axentia.se>
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2016 21:38:08 +0100
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 REGRESSION RESEND] usb: ohci-at91: use descriptor-based
 gpio APIs correctly

On 2016-12-22 18:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:43:55AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> The gpiod_get* function family does not want the -gpio suffix.
>> Use devm_gpiod_get_index_optional instead of devm_gpiod_get_optional.
>> The descriptor based APIs handle active high/low automatically.
>> The vbus-gpios are output, request enable while getting the gpio.
>> Don't try to get any vbus-gpios for ports outside num-ports.
>>
>> WTF? Big sigh.
>>
>> Fixes: 054d4b7b577d ("usb: ohci-at91: Use descriptor-based gpio APIs")
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Resending this, since the only response I've got is that the merge
>> window is open and that this patch has been put on hold due to that.
>> But I think this regression (which happend between v4.9 and current
>> master) should be fixed before the merge window closes.
> 
> I don't merge patches before -rc1 comes out, sorry, people should have
> tested linux-next better :)

Neat, shift the blame for the shit patch over to the messenger :)

> I'll catch up the first week of January, relax.

As we all know, unrelated regressions are painful when trying to locate
other problems. It's seems silly to have a few extra for no good reason.

*I* know about this one, it's those you don't know about that are worst.

Cheers,
peda

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ