lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 12:02:11 +0100 From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> To: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: [media] tm6000: Addition of an asterisk to the data type for “urb_dma”? Hello, I have looked at the implementation of the function “tm6000_alloc_urb_buffers” once more. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/media/usb/tm6000/tm6000-video.c?id=84ede50b623fb45c4c026c80d0abf8cc5193f041#n469 A pointer for an array is also assigned to the member “urb_dma” of the data structure “tm6000_core” there. I would interpret the corresponding data type specification in the way that only a single element should be managed by this field so far. http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/media/usb/tm6000/tm6000.h?v=4.9#L271 How do you think about to add another asterisk to this data type specification so that the desired array management would become bit clearer for such a field (similar to the member “urb_buffer”)? Regards, Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists