lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 15:31:37 +0100 From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be> To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] watchdog - v4.10 merge window Hi Linus, Guenter, > On 12/23/2016 11:45 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote: > >> > >>FWIW: > > > >Hey, I can generate those myself. > > > >But when they aren't generated by the person who sends the pull > >request, they are worthless. > > > >The whole point is that I need to get it with the pull request, so > >that I can see that what I get is what the requester really meant for > >me to get, and that (hopefully) the person who made the request looked > >it over and there's nothing surprising to that person either. > > > > Ok, point taken. Guess Wim should have asked me to send the pull request. Yep, co-maintainership is not well defined I guess. I will sent out a new pull-request with the necessary info in it. Kind regards, Wim.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists