linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161224143137.GA672@spo001.leaseweb.nl>
Date:   Sat, 24 Dec 2016 15:31:37 +0100
From:   Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] watchdog - v4.10 merge window

Hi Linus, Guenter,

> On 12/23/2016 11:45 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>FWIW:
> >
> >Hey, I can generate those myself.
> >
> >But when they aren't generated by the person who sends the pull
> >request, they are worthless.
> >
> >The whole point is that I need to get it with the pull request, so
> >that I can see that what I get is what the requester really meant for
> >me to get, and that (hopefully) the person who made the request looked
> >it over and there's nothing surprising to that person either.
> >
> 
> Ok, point taken. Guess Wim should have asked me to send the pull request.

Yep, co-maintainership is not well defined I guess. I will sent out a new pull-request
with the necessary info in it.

Kind regards,
Wim.