linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_tw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161224.210728.1213063344392674330.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sat, 24 Dec 2016 21:07:28 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com
Cc:     kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, kaber@...sh.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_tw_reuse knob

From: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 20:43:07 +0800

> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>

You need to provide something more than an empty commit message.

Instead, the commit message must explain why this particular
sysctl should be considered for namespacification and what
the implications, both good and bad, are for such a change.