[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d8b8516-aac6-c11c-dbbb-47fc01308f8c@jbeekman.nl>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 15:15:52 +0100
From: Jethro Beekman <kernel@...ekman.nl>
To: Scott Bauer <scott.bauer@...el.com>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Rafael.Antognolli@...el.com, axboe@...com, keith.busch@...el.com,
jonathan.derrick@...el.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
hch@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sagi@...mberg.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] nvme: Implement resume_from_suspend and SED
Allocation code.
On 19-12-16 20:35, Scott Bauer wrote:
> @@ -1796,6 +1797,13 @@ static void nvme_reset_work(struct work_struct *work)
> if (result)
> goto out;
>
> + result = nvme_opal_initialize(&dev->ctrl);
> + if (result)
> + goto out;
It seems you always try to intialize OPAL even if the drive doesn't support it.
I think you should check if the device supports security commands and then see
if it supports OPAL before calling this. See e.g.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/19/139 . Ideally, this code would check all
supported protocols and initialize the appropriate security device based on that.
Jethro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists