lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d8b8516-aac6-c11c-dbbb-47fc01308f8c@jbeekman.nl>
Date:   Sun, 25 Dec 2016 15:15:52 +0100
From:   Jethro Beekman <kernel@...ekman.nl>
To:     Scott Bauer <scott.bauer@...el.com>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Rafael.Antognolli@...el.com, axboe@...com, keith.busch@...el.com,
        jonathan.derrick@...el.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        hch@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sagi@...mberg.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] nvme: Implement resume_from_suspend and SED
 Allocation code.

On 19-12-16 20:35, Scott Bauer wrote:
> @@ -1796,6 +1797,13 @@ static void nvme_reset_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	if (result)
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	result = nvme_opal_initialize(&dev->ctrl);
> +	if (result)
> +		goto out;

It seems you always try to intialize OPAL even if the drive doesn't support it.
I think you should check if the device supports security commands and then see
if it supports OPAL before calling this. See e.g.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/19/139 . Ideally, this code would check all
supported protocols and initialize the appropriate security device based on that.

Jethro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ