| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <21de9ca7-e586-e5c8-ecda-d30c18bb6e40@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:49:53 +0900
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
robh+dt <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, krzk@...nel.org,
javier@....samsung.com, kishon <kishon@...com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
CPGS <cpgs@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] phy: exynos-pcie: Add support for Exynos PCIe phy
Hi Vivek,
On 12/27/2016 02:53 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> wrote:
>> This patch supports to use Generic Phy framework for Exynos PCIe phy.
>> When Exynos that supported the pcie want to use the PCIe,
>> it needs to control the phy resgister.
>> But it should be more complex to control in their own PCIe device drivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 9 ++
>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 237 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> index fe00f91..94b0433 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> @@ -341,6 +341,15 @@ config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD
>> This driver provides PHY interface for USB 3.0 DRD controller
>> present on Exynos5 SoC series.
>>
>> +config PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE
>> + bool "Exynos PCIe PHY driver"
>
> Is there a reason for this not being 'tristate' ?
Will change.
>
>> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS && OF
>> + depends on PCI_EXYNOS5433
>> + select GENERIC_PHY
>> + help
>> + Enable PCIe PHY support for Exynos SoC series.
>
> If this driver is for Exynos5433, then same should come in this help
> text as well.
will support the other exynos series.
I'm working on refactoring exynos5440 with PHY generic Framework.
Then this drive is not for only Exnyos5433. how about?
>
>> + This driver provides PHY interface for Exynos PCIe controller.
>> +
>> config PHY_PISTACHIO_USB
>> tristate "IMG Pistachio USB2.0 PHY driver"
>> depends on MACH_PISTACHIO
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> index a534cf5..586344d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4X12_USB2) += phy-exynos4x12-usb2.o
>> phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5250_USB2) += phy-exynos5250-usb2.o
>> phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_S5PV210_USB2) += phy-s5pv210-usb2.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD) += phy-exynos5-usbdrd.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE) += phy-exynos-pcie.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_APQ8064_SATA) += phy-qcom-apq8064-sata.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB) += phy-rockchip-usb.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_INNO_USB2) += phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..0f5eefd
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Samsung EXYNOS SoC series PCIe PHY driver
>> + *
>> + * Phy provider for PCIe controller on Exynos SoC series
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2016 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>> + * Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>
> nit: It's good to have these includes in alphabetical order.
Will fix.
>
>> +
>> +#define PCIE_EXYNOS5433_PMU_PHY_OFFSET 0x730
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(x) ((x) * 0x4)
>> +
>> +/* Sysreg Fsys register offset and bit for Exynos5433 */
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET 0x208
>> +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET_MASK 0xFF
>> +#define PCIE_MAC_RESET BIT(4)
>> +#define PCIE_L1SUB_CM_CON 0x1010
>> +#define PCIE_REFCLK_GATING_EN BIT(0)
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET 0x1020
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_RESET BIT(0)
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET 0x1040
>> +#define PCIE_GLOBAL_RESET BIT(0)
>> +#define PCIE_REFCLK BIT(1)
>> +#define PCIE_REFCLK_MASK 0x16
>> +#define PCIE_APP_REQ_EXIT_L1_MODE BIT(5)
>> +
>> +enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type {
>> + PCIE_PHY_TYPE_EXYNOS5433,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct exynos_pcie_phy_data {
>> + enum exynos_pcie_phy_data_type ctrl_type;
>
> Why do we need this controller type ?
> If there are changes in the IP between different version,
> then you can as well use different compatibles.
Do you mean is the using "of_device_is_compatible()"?
>
>> + u32 pmureg_offset; /* PMU_REG offset */
>
> Please use top comments.
>
>> + struct phy_ops *ops;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* for Exynos pcie phy */
>> +struct exynos_pcie_phy {
>> + const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data *drv_data;
>> + struct regmap *pmureg;
>> + struct regmap *fsysreg;
>> + void __iomem *phy_base;
>
> just 'base' ?
Will change
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void exynos_pcie_phy_writel(void __iomem *base, u32 val, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + writel(val, base + offset);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int exynos_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
>> +{
>> + struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> +
>> + if (ep->fsysreg) {
>> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET,
>> + PCIE_PHY_RESET, 1);
>> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET,
>> + PCIE_MAC_RESET, 0);
>> + /* PHY refclk 24MHz */
>> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET,
>> + PCIE_REFCLK_MASK, PCIE_REFCLK);
>> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET,
>> + PCIE_GLOBAL_RESET, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x11, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x3));
>> +
>> + /* band gap reference on */
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x20));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x4b));
>> +
>> + /* jitter tunning */
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x34, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x4));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x02, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x7));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x41, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x21));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x7F, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x14));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xC0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x15));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x61, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x36));
>> +
>> + /* D0 uninit.. */
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x44, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x3D));
>> +
>> + /* 24MHz */
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x94, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x8));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x9));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x93, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xA));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x6B, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xC));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA5, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0xF));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x34, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x16));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA3, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x17));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x1A));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x71, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x23));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x4C, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x24));
>> +
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x0E, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x26));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x14, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x7));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x48, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x43));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x44, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x44));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x03, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x45));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xA7, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x48));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x13, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x54));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x04, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x31));
>> + exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_OFFSET(0x32));
>> +
>> + if (ep->fsysreg) {
>> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET,
>> + PCIE_PHY_RESET, 0);
>> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET,
>> + PCIE_MAC_RESET_MASK, PCIE_MAC_RESET);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int exynos_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>> +{
>> + struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> +
>> + if (ep->pmureg) {
>> + if (regmap_update_bits(ep->pmureg, ep->drv_data->pmureg_offset,
>> + BIT(0), 1))
>> + dev_warn(&phy->dev, "Failed to update regmap bit.\n");
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (ep->fsysreg) {
>> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET,
>> + PCIE_APP_REQ_EXIT_L1_MODE, 0);
>> + regmap_update_bits(ep->fsysreg, PCIE_L1SUB_CM_CON,
>> + PCIE_REFCLK_GATING_EN, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct phy_ops exynos_phy_ops = {
>
> const ?
Yep.
>
>> + .init = exynos_pcie_phy_init,
>> + .power_on = exynos_pcie_phy_power_on,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data exynos5433_pcie_phy_data = {
>> + .ctrl_type = PCIE_PHY_TYPE_EXYNOS5433,
>> + .pmureg_offset = PCIE_EXYNOS5433_PMU_PHY_OFFSET,
>> + .ops = &exynos_phy_ops,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id exynos_pcie_phy_match[] = {
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-pcie-phy",
>> + .data = &exynos5433_pcie_phy_data,
>> + },
>> + {}
>
> missing comma after braces.
Will fix.
>
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, exynos_pcie_phy_match);
>> +
>> +static int exynos_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> + struct exynos_pcie_phy *exynos_phy;
>> + struct phy *generic_phy;
>> + struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data *drv_data;
>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>> +
>> + exynos_phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*exynos_phy), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!exynos_phy)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + exynos_phy->phy_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base))
>> + return PTR_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base);
>> +
>> + exynos_phy->pmureg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np,
>> + "samsung,pmureg-phandle");
>> + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->pmureg)) {
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "pmureg syscon regmap lookup failed.\n");
>> + exynos_phy->pmureg = NULL;
>> + }
>
> Is this really optional ? There should be a failure path for IP versions that
> require this compulsorily.
Agreed. Will fix.
>
>> +
>> + match = of_match_node(exynos_pcie_phy_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
>> + drv_data = match->data;
>
> Please use of_device_get_match_data().
Ok.
>
>> + exynos_phy->drv_data = drv_data;
>> +
>> + exynos_phy->fsysreg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np,
>> + "samsung,fsys-sysreg");
>> + if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->fsysreg)) {
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Fsysreg syscon regmap lookup failed.\n");
>> + exynos_phy->fsysreg = NULL;
>> + }
>
> Same here, is this optional ?
Will fix.
Thanks for reviewing.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
>
>> +
>> + generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node, drv_data->ops);
>> + if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
>> + }
>> +
>> + phy_set_drvdata(generic_phy, exynos_phy);
>> + phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
>> +
>> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver exynos_pcie_phy_driver = {
>> + .probe = exynos_pcie_phy_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .of_match_table = exynos_pcie_phy_match,
>> + .name = "exynos_pcie_phy",
>> + }
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(exynos_pcie_phy_driver);
>> --
>> 2.10.2
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
> Thanks
> Vivek
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists