[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAMH-yutJN3wLYze9Ao120LcCcE7F7JbpZyeghg-vB9pyFObkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 10:44:53 +0100
From: Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@...ndarydevices.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/3] pinctrl: imx: use radix trees for groups and functions
Hi Linus, All,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Gary Bisson
> <gary.bisson@...ndarydevices.com> wrote:
>
> > This change is inspired from the pinctrl-single architecture.
> >
> > The problem with current implementation is that it isn't possible
> > to add/remove functions and/or groups dynamically. The radix tree
> > offers an easy way to do so. The intent is to offer a follow-up
> > patch later that will enable the use of pinctrl nodes in dt-overlays.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@...ndarydevices.com>
>
> This patch doesn't apply on v4.10-rc1 so please rebase it
> on the mainline and resend as v3, include Fabio's review tag.
Actually it applies if the first patch of this v2 series is also applied first.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9458883/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9458889/
The 3rd patch of the series can be discarded though since it was just
an example to show the benefit of the first two.
I guess someone needs to also ack/review the first one. Because
switching to radix tree keeping the const qualifier of the driver
structure isn't really useful.
Regards,
Gary
Powered by blists - more mailing lists