[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9aa650ad-a32d-e942-1c6b-b069c8a2b87a@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:44:59 -0500
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, Ma Jun <majun258@...wei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <charles.garcia-tobin@....com>,
huxinwei@...wei.com, yimin@...wei.com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/14] ACPI: platform: setup MSI domain for ACPI based
platform device
On 12/25/2016 8:31 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> A type->setup() would be somewhat cleaner I think, but then it's more
>> code. Whichever works better I guess. :-)
> Agree, I will demo the type->setup() way and send out the patch for review,
> also I find one minor issue for the IORT code, will update that also for next
> version.
Can you provide details on what the minor issue is with the IORT code?
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists