[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161229031432.GA18506@hector.attlocal.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 21:14:32 -0600
From: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [1/5] ARM: dts: qcom: apq8064: Add missing scm clock
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:49:35AM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> As per the device tree binding the apq8064 scm node requires the core
> clock to be specified, so add this.
>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> index 268bd470c865..78bf155a52f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> @@ -303,6 +303,9 @@
> firmware {
> scm {
> compatible = "qcom,scm-apq8064";
> +
> + clocks = <&gcc CE3_CORE_CLK>;
> + clock-names = "core";
Isn't this supposed to be the DFAB clk? The RPM one? I think that's why we let
the clock just fall through optionally before the recent changes that broke
this.
Regards,
Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists