[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afde074d-c796-56bd-b337-f285f37414c6@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:06:58 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: artemi.ivanov@...entembedded.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dma_mapping: allow PCI host driver to limit
DMA mask
On 12/30/2016 12:46 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> It is possible that PCI device supports 64-bit DMA addressing, and thus
>> it's driver sets device's dma_mask to DMA_BIT_MASK(64), however PCI host
>
> Its.
>
>> bridge has limitations on inbound transactions addressing. Example of
>> such setup is NVME
>
> Isn't it called NVMe?
>
>> SSD device connected to RCAR PCIe controller.
>
> R=Car.
Sorry, R-Car. :-)
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists