linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/20] gpio: pca953x: Add optional reset gpio control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZG2j4_LwP8KUVBTOtXma75YvYtC6CW1QqYwOm-MOZgHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Dec 2016 14:17:38 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/20] gpio: pca953x: Add optional reset gpio control

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Steve Longerbeam
<slongerbeam@...il.com> wrote:

> Add optional reset-gpios pin control. If present, de-assert the
> specified reset gpio pin to bring the chip out of reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
> Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org

This seems like a separate patch from the other 19 patches so please send it
separately so I can handle logistics easier in the future.


> @@ -133,6 +134,7 @@ struct pca953x_chip {
>         const char *const *names;
>         unsigned long driver_data;
>         struct regulator *regulator;
> +       struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;

Why do you even keep this around in the device state container?

As you only use it in the probe() function, use a local variable.

The descriptor will be free():ed by the devm infrastructure anyways.

> +               /* see if we need to de-assert a reset pin */
> +               chip->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev,
> +                                                          "reset",
> +                                                          GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> +               if (IS_ERR(chip->reset_gpio)) {
> +                       dev_err(&client->dev, "request for reset pin failed\n");
> +                       return PTR_ERR(chip->reset_gpio);
> +               }

Nice.

> +               if (chip->reset_gpio) {
> +                       /* bring chip out of reset */
> +                       dev_info(&client->dev, "releasing reset\n");
> +                       gpiod_set_value(chip->reset_gpio, 0);
> +               }

Is this really needed given that you set it low in the
devm_gpiod_get_optional()?

Yours,
Linus Walleij