[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161230.152325.1460360247883491150.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 15:23:25 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, khorenko@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: make tcp_notsent_lowat sysctl knob behave as
true unsigned int
From: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:35:07 +0300
> @@ -958,7 +959,9 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_net_table[] = {
> .data = &init_net.ipv4.sysctl_tcp_notsent_lowat,
> .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
> .mode = 0644,
> - .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> + .proc_handler = proc_doulongvec_minmax,
> + .extra1 = &zero,
> + .extra2 = &uint_max,
It seems much simpler to use "proc_douintvec()" to fix this bug.
Doesn't it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists