lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOAejn2+f+a_AsTPDwyqmr-DSzLcqsVNcgUvq0NNJk3xWRLBJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:26:33 +0100
From:   "M'boumba Cedric Madianga" <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
To:     Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] dmaengine: stm32-dma: Bug fixes and improvements series

Hi Vinod,

> So you should order fixes first and then new additions.
> Fixes go in for current release whereas the rest for next one.
Ok thanks for the info.

> I have applied two to fixes and rest to updated, patch 5 didn't apply, please
> resend that one.
I have tried to apply patch 5 on top of slave-dma/fixes branch but I
don't have any issue.
So, I am going to resend this patch in order to be sure that there is no diff.

Best regards,

Cedric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ