[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOAejn2+f+a_AsTPDwyqmr-DSzLcqsVNcgUvq0NNJk3xWRLBJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:26:33 +0100
From: "M'boumba Cedric Madianga" <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] dmaengine: stm32-dma: Bug fixes and improvements series
Hi Vinod,
> So you should order fixes first and then new additions.
> Fixes go in for current release whereas the rest for next one.
Ok thanks for the info.
> I have applied two to fixes and rest to updated, patch 5 didn't apply, please
> resend that one.
I have tried to apply patch 5 on top of slave-dma/fixes branch but I
don't have any issue.
So, I am going to resend this patch in order to be sure that there is no diff.
Best regards,
Cedric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists