linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] dmaengine: stm32-dma: Bug fixes and improvements series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:26:33 +0100
From:   "M'boumba Cedric Madianga" <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
To:     Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] dmaengine: stm32-dma: Bug fixes and improvements series

Hi Vinod,

> So you should order fixes first and then new additions.
> Fixes go in for current release whereas the rest for next one.
Ok thanks for the info.

> I have applied two to fixes and rest to updated, patch 5 didn't apply, please
> resend that one.
I have tried to apply patch 5 on top of slave-dma/fixes branch but I
don't have any issue.
So, I am going to resend this patch in order to be sure that there is no diff.

Best regards,

Cedric