lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:34:32 +0100 From: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se> To: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com> Cc: stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi, geert+renesas@...der.be, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Openrisc 4.10 fixes On 12/31/2016 11:50 PM, Stafford Horne wrote: > Hi Jonas, > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote: >> Hi Stafford, >> >> Post-merge window patches should be bug fixes, only. Patch 1/3 probably >> qualifies, but the others are far too trivial to be pushing now. Just put >> them on your 4.11 branch. > Thanks, for some reason I thought minor changes like this were ok too. > I will only push the one change in this case. The rest will go to my > 4.11 queue, which I'll send for review in the next few days. Actually, it's not even bug-fixes, just fixes for regressions. Patch 1 fixes something which has never worked so it's not even a regression... just hold everything for 4.11. Get your 4.11 branch ready and pushed to -next now and then start working on stuff for 4.12. > > That brings up a question, Do you want to stay in the MAINTAINERS file? > I noticed sometimes you dont get around to review, but often when you do > the reviews are helpful like this one. Yes, keep me in the MAINTAINERS file. Thanks, Jonas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists